I don’t really blog over here. I got the account so I could post to ConClub when Dave invited me to post there. I appreciate the follows, but my blog is located on my website, which also has links, downloads, news feeds, videos, and more. Check it out if you have a minute. The website address is: http://independentrealist.weebly.com/, and my blog address is: http://independentrealist.weebly.com/blog.html
Category Archives: Uncategorized
With everyone else talking about this, I was a bit hesitant to comment on it as well. That being said, however, with the way things turned out, the more I read and heard, the madder I got, and so here goes.
So, Jimmy Hoffa, Jr. is encouraging people to “take out” the conservatives. He said this to a huge crowd of his union sycophants who all cheered when he said it. Next up to the podium was King Hussein I, who said that he was proud of Hoffa. Hmmmm? Now what does this say? Are the words of Hoffa a threat? Well, he did not say “vote them out of office” and he did not say “defeat them at the polls” and he did not say “vote democrat.” No, he said “Let’s take these son of a bitches out.”
Now for all those who will say I am taking this statement out of context, let’s look at it in context. Hoffa said: “We’ve got to keep an eye on the battle that we face, the war on workers and you see it everywhere. It is the Tea Party and you know there’s only one way to beat and win that war. The one thing about working people is we like a good fight and you know what? They’ve got a war, they’ve got a war with us and there’s only going to be one winner. It’s going to be the workers of Michigan and America. We’re going to win that war. President Obama this is your Army. We are ready to march. Let’s take these son of a bitches out and give America back to America where we belong. Thank you very much.”
Hoffa says the workers are at war with the Tea Party (whom libs define as any conservative), and there’s only one way to beat the Tea Party and win that war. He said that working people (his working people), including him, like a good fight. He said that the working people (again, his working people) are Obama’s Army, and that they (and he) are ready to march. He then said (or gave the order?) to “take these son of a bitches out and give America back to America where we belong.”
Yep, sounds like a threat to me, and his speech sounded inflammatory to me, as if he were trying to incite his little “Obama Army” to action, and not necessarily peaceful action. Especially when one considers his background. I mean, let’s face it, he is Jimmy Hoffa, Jr., the son of a Mafia connected labor leader. And he did grow up in that environment, and he did work for many years with his father and his father’s Mafia connections. Looking at this from that perspective, a quick Google search of Mafia terms synonymous with the word “kill” include, “rub out,” “waste,” “hit,” “whack,” “take for a ride,” and “take out.” (Source)
So, it isn’t really that hard to connect the dots. Playing “6 degrees to the Mob” with Jimmy Hoffa, Jr. shouldn’t take very long. Now of course, this is just my opinion, and I could very well be dead…wrong, but it is my opinion nonetheless.
Now I will admit that I am not afraid of Jimmy Hoffa coming to my house and killing me. He’s much older than me, and personally I think I could take him. But I do worry that one of his whackadoodle sycophants may just take him literally and do his or her best to “take out” the first conservative he or she comes into contact with. Of course, I am using libocrat logic here. Remember Jared Loughner? The nut job with a gun down in Arizona who shot a little girl, a judge, a Congresswoman, and others? The libocrats insisted that he was influenced by a map drawn up by Sarah Palin (or one of her workers) that featured cross hairs on Arizona. As much of a stretch that was, the libocrats put all of the blame on Sarah Palin and conservatives everywhere. What Hoffa said was more direct. Much more direct. So my question still stands, are conservatives in America, including those currently serving as elected officials, now in danger because of Hoffa’s words?
In addition, and more importantly, where is the hue and cry from the libocrats? Nowhere, that’s where. In fact, when DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Shultz was asked point blank for her response to Hoffa’s words, she refused to condemn them. She could have very easily have said that she did not approve of them, or that Hoffa was speaking metaphorically, or given any other statement or excuse that may have defused any potential danger by a union whackadoodle. But she did not. In fact, she did everything she could to change the subject, (Source)
And Joe Biden, the animatronic VP, helped to inflame members of “Obama’s Army” when he told them “This is a hard through the heart and soul of the labor union. It’s a fight literally for our right to exist. Don’t misunderstand what this is. Don’t misunderstand – it’s not a joke. It’s not a joke. Not an applause line. You are the only folks keeping the barbarians in the gates. You are the only nongovernmental power, the only nongovernmental power, the only one that has the power and the capacity to stop this onslaught.” (Source). Conservatives are “barbarians”? Really?
Obama also did not condemn Hoffa’s remarks. In fact, right after Hoffa spoke, Obama took the stage and said that he was “proud” of Hoffa. (Source). Shades of Bill Ayers (one of Obama’s mentors) who once reveled in murder and anarchy, and presumably still does. I guess Obama learned will at the feet of Bill Ayers (and Jeremiah Wright, and his other hate filled mentors). Does Obama realize that by not condemning Hoffa’s words he is condoning them, and by saying he is proud of Hoffa, he is approving Hoffa’s words? Probably. Does he care? Probably not.
Well, now that curtain has been opened, and the true nature of the left and their “Army” of Obama brown shirts has been revealed, at least we know where we stand, and what we can expect. And, lest you think I am blowing this out of proportion, did you know that the left now has their very own online video game? Yep, they do, and it’s called “Tea Party Zombies Must Die!” A wonderful little game that libocrats will truly love to play. In this bloody and gore filled game, libocrats can get to slaughter Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachman, Rick Santorum, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, and several other conservatives, including the “Generic pissed off old white guy zombie” and the “Pissed off stupid white trash redneck birther zombie.” Interesting that there are no black zombies in this game. I am sure Al Sharpton, Shirley Jackson Lee, Maxine Waters, Jesse Jackson and all the other plantation overseers are comparing their top scores even as we speak. (Source)
Can you imagine if anyone developed a game like this and made the zombies liberals? The hue and cry would be heard around the world! And where is the condemnation of this game? Only from the conservatives, and not one from any libocrat anywhere. By the way, the company that produced this game out is called “StarvingEyes,” and the developer is Jason Oda. I would encourage everyone to contact their Congressman or Congresswoman, and express their condemnation of this game.
I think the mindset of the left is crystal clear. It is murderous, and it is dangerous.
In an effort to appease (and therefore not offend) people, the left began pushing hard to implement the practice of political correctness into American society back in the 1970’s. Although the practice existed long before that in a more rudimentary form, it was in 1970 that the term was coined, and the implementation of it as an acceptable and preferred style of thought began. And just where has it gotten us? Not only have symbolic expressions of Christian holidays become banned from public areas, but the very phrase “Merry Christmas” has been replaced with “Season’s Greetings” and “Happy Holidays” around the country. Elementary school children no longer have Easter egg hunts, they now search for something called “Spring Sphere’s”, which does nothing but promote an ignorance of geometry. The mentally ill are now intelligence challenged, and so on, and so on ad infinitum ad nauseum.
However, aside from making everyone look, sound and act like a complete moron, political correctness is now endangering our very lives. It is being reported that although there were witnesses to the jihadist rants of Nidal Hasan (the murdering Ft. Hood mohammedan jihadist), including some who heard him say that killing fellow American soldiers in the name of islam was acceptable. Those witnesses did not come forward and report his treasonous statements, however, because they were afraid of being labeled as prejudiced. Because of political correctness 13 American soldiers died. To make matters worse (if they can be), the President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, refuses to even utter the phrase “Violent Islamic Extremism”, choosing instead to say “violent extremism”, and thus promoting the idea that maybe, just maybe it wasn’t mohammedan whackadoodles that attacked us on 9/11 and are yet today plotting our bloody end. No, he would rather insinuate that there are so many extremist groups out there that it is wrong to point a finger at those who actually attacked us. Need I remind King Hussein I that it was not the KKK who blew up the U.S.S. Cole. It was not the American Nazi Party who planted bombs under the World Trade Center. It was not La Raza who, wait they’re Obama’s friends so I can’t use them as an example of extremists. Um … It was not E.L.F. who flew planes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and into a field in Pennsylvania. No, Barry, it was islamic terrorists. Did you catch that? ISLAMIC terrorists.
It’s one thing to be polite and an inoffensive, it’s quite another thing to take political correctness to such a degree that it endangers Americans.
Many people have wondered just how the 9/11 hijackers managed to survive in this country for so long before the attacks, all while on their own. As it turns out, they weren’t exactly on their own. They had a lot of help, and a lot of that help came from within the United States itself. When asked if that terrorist support network still existed within America, Former Sen. Bob Graham (D-Fla) said yes.
Remember what happened in 1916? Well, that may be a bit before your time, so let me help you out a bit here. On the morning of March 9, 1916, a group of Mexican bandits crossed the border into the United States, shot and killed seventeen Americans, and took over a town. The United States Army showed up and chased the bandits back across the border and managed to kill some of the scum before they got away. Clearly it was the immediate armed response by the Army that routed the invaders and prevented anymore American deaths at their hands.
As interesting as this may be, you may ask, what does this have to do with anything today. Well, it has happened again. Just last Thursday, a group of armed Mexican Federales crossed the border into the United States and fired on American citizens. Fortunately no Americans were injured. Instead of a swift response to this blatant attack on American soil by armed agents of a foreign government (like the Army did in 1916), the Obama administration says they will “investigate” the situation.
Recently, one Abdul Hassan has petitioned the Federal Election Commission to give an opinion as to whether or not he can legitimately run for President of the United States. Hassan is asking because although he is an American citizen, he was not born in this country. He was born in Guyana in 1974, thus, he is not a “natural born citizen” as required by the United States Constitution.
What is interesting about this situation is that not only is the Federal Election Commission not authorized to make this sort of determination (they are authorized to monitor campaign finances, and investigate and prosecute should any violation of campaign finance laws occur), but even more interesting is that if the FEC does agree that Hassan can run for President, a dangerous, a very dangerous precedent will be set.
Not that I think for even a second that Hassan could ever win the White House, nor do I believe his candidacy is even about becoming President. I believe that the single and solitary reason this situation exists is to see if the Supreme Court and Congress will step in and overrule any opinions the FEC gives in support of Hassan.
If the FEC does give an opinion in support of Hassan’s candidacy, and if it goes unchallenged, then the “natural born citizen” requirement as stated in the U.S. Constitution is null and void. If Hassan does run (which I am sure he will if he receives the FEC’s support), then although he will lose the election, I am certain that his campaign will be closely monitored as well as the reaction of the American people to ascertain whether or not it would be possible to elect a foreign born citizen to the White House.
Is this something as innocent as a patriotic foreign born citizen desiring to serve his country? It is possible. I am sure there are many in this country who fit that description, as evidenced by those serving in our armed forces. However, this could also be a “testing of the waters” so to speak, by a fifth column movement within our country. Specifically, an islamic fifth column.
Now maybe I have read too many Brad Thor and Vince Flynn novels (but I do love reading them!), and maybe I am falling into a conspiracy theory hole. Anything is possible here. That being said, however, I am nonetheless suspicious of this unknown foreign born citizen popping up out of the woodwork and declaring his candidacy. What makes me even more suspicious is that I cannot seem to find anything about him other than his petition to the FEC and his presidential candidacy website. I cannot seem to even find a photograph of the man, not even on his website, and that alone seems strange to me.
All in all, I believe this situation calls for extreme scrutiny.
Now stop your chuckling, I happen to think this is a legitimate question. Of course the people of America will ultimately decide, sort of, maybe. But for the majority of Americans, their decision will not be based on the various platforms, or promises, or even their voting records or political experience. No, most people will simply base their decision on what the nightly news tells them. Sad to be true, but not just sad, no, this falls more into the category of deplorable. To rest one’s fate and the fate of one’s country on the scripted prattling of talking heads is to me, unconscionable. And yet it happens.
Why it happens is a mystery to me. Maybe people simply trust the news. News anchors are chosen primarily because they exude a certain degree of trustworthiness. Not that they necessarily are trustworthy, but they are groomed and paid to appear that way. Maybe people are just plain lazy – politically speaking. Whatever the reason, both politicians and new outlets are counting on the fact that most Americans will simply vote the way their favorite news anchor tells them.
As evidence of the lack of trustworthiness of the MSM (Main Stream Media) anchors and writers, I would point to the recent Ames Straw Poll in Iowa. Although Michelle Bachman came in first, Ron Paul second and Tim Pawlenty third, every poll I have seen, and every MSM news report I have seen, places Mitt Romney as the favorite of conservatives everywhere. Mitt Romney? Really? The man is a fan of Obamacare, one of the main things conservatives dislike about Obama. Why would conservatives vote for Romney? They wouldn’t. But the MSM has decided that Romney will be the Republican candidate, regardless of what the American people want.
But the MSM depends on Americans watching and listening to everything they say, and the politicians depend on it as well. By now, most Americans are familiar with the infamous John Kerry video wherein he relates to the MSM that they need to stop being so balanced in their reporting. Specifically when it comes to Tea Party conservatives. In case you happened to miss this, here it is.
As you can clearly see, when it comes to trustworthiness, don’t place all of your faith in the MSM, or the power-mongers on the hill. It is time for the American people to wake up, and step up to the plate and take responsibility for our country. If you are not informed as to the issues, and where the various candidates actually stand on those issues (historically as opposed to their campaign talking points), then it is clearly time to do so. To do anything less is to exhibit a marked indifference to your country’s future, and yours as well.
So how does one become informed – and I mean really informed? One of the best places to start is the blogosphere. The majority of Americans blogging today are not doing so to make money, they are doing so because they care about their country – our country. They are not dependent upon some sugar daddy like Rupert Murdoch or George Soros, and therefore obligated to regurgitate the opinions of those who sign their paychecks regardless of how ludicrous those billion dollar opinions may be. In fact, many political blogs, in particular conservative blogs, are surprisingly non-partisan. Most are not afraid to call out a politician because of that politicians ridiculous statements, patent lies, or hopelessly pointless policies that are clearly doomed to failure – and all without regard to that politicians political affiliation. To most conservative bloggers, at least the smaller blogs such as the Independent Realist and others, care only about America, and how to keep America great. That and that alone, is the overriding principle and purpose of the multitude of small conservative blogs.
Rather than belabor this point, I am going to direct my readers to a more in depth article on this subject over at the Zilla of the Resistance blog. You can read her blog article by clicking here.
I strongly encourage you to read her article.